<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s cultural imperialism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://votefor.me.uk/google-continues-to-impose-cultural-imperialism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://votefor.me.uk/google-continues-to-impose-cultural-imperialism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:39:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Falconer</title>
		<link>http://votefor.me.uk/google-continues-to-impose-cultural-imperialism/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Falconer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votefor.me.uk/?p=234#comment-200</guid>
		<description>I have to admit I always presumed the difference was more clear cut than that.  I like the OED option idea - there are all sorts of strange languages in Google&#039;s settings - Klingon, Elmer Fudd etc. so maybe it&#039;s not too far fetched...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit I always presumed the difference was more clear cut than that.  I like the OED option idea &#8211; there are all sorts of strange languages in Google&#8217;s settings &#8211; Klingon, Elmer Fudd etc. so maybe it&#8217;s not too far fetched&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Asquith</title>
		<link>http://votefor.me.uk/google-continues-to-impose-cultural-imperialism/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Asquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votefor.me.uk/?p=234#comment-198</guid>
		<description>It is interesting, as it seems very cultural even within the UK. If you look at wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_spelling they show that it&#039;s only recently that we&#039;ve moved to -ise, but also that some people still use it. Maybe it&#039;s not enough to know the UK rules on spelling, as our rules are so difficult.

You would argue that -ise is more common now though, maybe you could have an OED option in your settings :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting, as it seems very cultural even within the UK. If you look at wikipedia <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_spelling" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_spelling</a> they show that it&#8217;s only recently that we&#8217;ve moved to -ise, but also that some people still use it. Maybe it&#8217;s not enough to know the UK rules on spelling, as our rules are so difficult.</p>
<p>You would argue that -ise is more common now though, maybe you could have an OED option in your settings <img src='http://votefor.me.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

